Answer – You may relocate or reinstall an existing sign as long as it meets or exceeds the current minimum Retroreflectivity requirement levels. The FHWA ruling on relocated signs require that all relocated signs and
posts meet the new regulations in reflectivity and crash worthiness.
Answer – It needs to be tested in some manner.
Answer – You can visually inspect the sign which is often an unreliable testing method.
Answer – You may have the sign tested by using a reflectometer (Reflectivity Meter).
Answer – You may relocate or reinstall an existing sign
as long as it meets or exceeds the current minimum Retroreflectivity requirement levels. The FHWA ruling on
relocated signs require that all relocated signs and posts
meet the new regulations in reflectivity and crash worthiness.
Answer – It needs to be tested in some manner.
Answer – You can visually inspect the sign which is often an unreliable testing method.
Answer – You may have the sign tested by using a reflectometer (Reflectivity Meter).
Answer – The Agency, contractor or person who is responsible
for the sign relocation or reinstallation may be negligent or liable for any injuries, accidents or incidents that are the result of the noncompliant sign that was reinstalled or relocated.
Answer – They may be responsible because they are the last agency, contractor or person who had the opportunity to
evaluate the condition and the minimum Retroreflectivity level
of that sign.
Answer – Our recommendation, is testing the sign with a Reflectometer to insure that the sign meets the minimum reflectivity standards.
Answer – Documentation – have the testing company or
agency provide you with a written report or documentation
of the testing results and maintain this report for your records.
We recommend keeping the records for a minimum of 10
years.
Answer – Have the signs marked were labeled with the
date and testing companies information
Answer – You may relocate or reinstall an existing sign as long as it meets or exceeds the current minimum Retroreflectivity requirement levels. The FHWA ruling on relocated signs require that all relocated signs and posts meet the new regulations in reflectivity and crash worthiness.
Answer – It needs to be tested in some manner.
Answer – You can visually inspect the sign which is often an unreliable testing method.
Answer – You may have the sign tested by using a reflectometer (Reflectivity Meter).
Answer – The Agency, contractor or person who is responsible for the sign relocation or reinstallation may be negligent or liable for any injuries, accidents or incidents that are the result of the noncompliant sign that was reinstalled or relocated.
Answer – They may be responsible because they are the last agency, contractor or person who had the opportunity to evaluate the condition and the minimum Retroreflectivity level of that sign.
Answer – Our recommendation, is testing the sign with a Reflectometer to insure that the sign meets the minimum reflectivity standards.
Answer – Documentation – have the testing company or agency provide you with a written report or documentation of the testing results and maintain this report for your records. We recommend keeping the records for a minimum of 10 years.
Answer – Have the signs marked were labeled with the date and testing companies information
Many times when an industrial or commercial business, developer, residential complex or building is built, a Highway occupancy permit is issued or required to access the state or municipal roadway. Many times traffic signs are required to be installed to control traffic entering and exiting the roadway.
Many Highway occupancy permits and approved plans (which are signed by the state and/or municipal agency and the property owner or representative of the owner) indicate in the notes on the plans that the property owner is responsible to maintain any items which are part of the Highway occupancy permit or plan. This includes traffic signs, which the majority of the time is not the responsibility of the state or municipal agency to maintain and replace as they become no longer serviceable.
Answer – This means that the owner of the property is
responsible to maintain the traffic signs relating to the Highway occupancy permit for this property. They must be maintained to the serviceable standards under the current laws. This includes maintaining minimum reflectivity requirements and levels for those signs.
Answer – There have been insurance claims and settlements relating to missing or non-maintained signs when accidents, injuries or death have occurred within the areas of the
Highway occupancy permit.
Answer – There are currently law educational institutions
teaching information relating to the Retroreflectivity
requirements within the USA. We expect this to become a
large litigation and liability issue within the coming years.
Answer – We expect that in the future, insurance firms
providing coverage for liability, to focus on traffic sign management and Retroreflectivity requirements. It is
possible that in the future the company, owner or firm being insured may be required to provide proof that these
requirements are being met in order to receive coverage. Depending on the potential for incidents his could provide a
great liability concern for the insuring agency.
Answer – You will need to have a written plan in place by
June 13, 2014. You will need to implement that plan, which will require you or a firm you have contracted with to document,
test and manage any traffic signs which are your responsibility.
There are countless accidents, injuries and even deaths that
occur when vehicles are exiting and entering the Highway.
Based on the information and research that D. E. Gemmill Inc.
has completed, failure to put a traffic sign management and assessment program into place may create a huge liability issue
for the property owner or permit holder.
Answer – This means that the owner of the property is responsible to maintain the traffic signs relating to the Highway occupancy permit for this property. They must be maintained to the serviceable standards under the current laws. This includes maintaining minimum reflectivity requirements and levels for those signs.
Answer – The property owner is responsible for maintaining all signs associated with the Highway occupancy permit, at all times.
Answer – The owner’s responsibility will continue as long as they own the property and traffic continues to use the entrance and exit onto the roadway for which the permit or was obtained.
Answer – Yes. According to the MUTCD any road open to public travel even on private property shall maintain a traffic signage to minimum reflectivity levels.
Answer – There have been insurance claims and settlements relating to missing or non-maintained signs when accidents, injuries or death have occurred within the areas of the Highway occupancy permit.
Answer – There are currently law educational institutions teaching information relating to the Retroreflectivity requirements within the USA. We expect this to become a large litigation and liability issue within the coming years.
Answer – We expect that in the future, insurance firms providing coverage for liability, to focus on traffic sign management and Retroreflectivity requirements. It is possible that in the future the company, owner or firm being insured may be required to provide proof that these requirements are being met in order to receive coverage. Depending on the potential for incidents his could provide a great liability concern for the insuring agency.
Answer – You will need to have a written plan in place by June 13, 2014. You will need to implement that plan, which will require you or a firm you have contracted with to document, test and manage any traffic signs which are your responsibility.
There are countless accidents, injuries and even deaths that occur when vehicles are exiting and entering the Highway. Based on the information and research that D. E. Gemmill Inc. has completed, failure to put a traffic sign management and assessment program into place may create a huge liability issue for the property owner or permit holder.
Answer – Currently no government agency will likely inspect your property at this time. In the future however
the plan could become part of inspection, occupancy or licensing for a municipality, as they look to alleviate responsibility for any incidents.
Answer – We expect in the future, if your insurance carrier inspects the property they may ask to see your plan.
We expect this to be more prevalent as lawyers and insurance carriers become familiar with the law and look
to place blame or alleviate blame for any incidents in which their clients are involved.
Answer – Yes. The law states that any private property open to public travel shall maintain their signs in accordance with the MUTCD Retroreflectivity levels.
Answer – Currently no government agency will likely inspect
your property at this time. In the future however the plan
could become part of inspection, occupancy or licensing for a municipality, as they look to alleviate responsibility for any incidents.
Answer – We expect in the future, if your insurance carrier
inspects the property they may ask to see your plan.
We expect this to be more prevalent as lawyers and insurance carriers become familiar with the law and look to place blame
or alleviate blame for any incidents in which their clients are involved.
Answer – If you are proactive in this law, it may assist you
in relief of liability and/or negligence. If you can prove that the traffic signs meet or exceed the current minimum levels of Retroreflectivity, have documentation that they sre installed correctly, and maintained in working order you and or your insurance carrier may be able to better defend yourself should
an accident or injury occur.
Answer – Yes. The law states that any private property open to public travel shall maintain their signs in accordance with the MUTCD Retroreflectivity levels.
Answer – Currently no government agency will likely inspect your property at this time. In the future however the plan could become part of inspection, occupancy or licensing for a municipality, as they look to alleviate responsibility for any incidents.
Answer – We expect in the future, if your insurance carrier inspects the property they may ask to see your plan. We expect this to be more prevalent as lawyers and insurance carriers become familiar with the law and look to place blame or alleviate blame for any incidents in which their clients are involved.
Answer – If you are proactive in this law, it may assist you in relief of liability and/or negligence. If you can prove that the traffic signs meet or exceed the current minimum levels of Retroreflectivity, have documentation that they sre installed correctly, and maintained in working order you and or your insurance carrier may be able to better defend yourself should an accident or injury occur.
Answer – Yes. The law states that this standard includes permanent temporary and portable traffic signage.
Answer – Possibly all parties involved may be responsible. Our opinion on this subject is that if the signs and
devices blatantly do not meet the Retroreflective requirements and you own them and continue to use them
you may be negligent and or liable for damages or injuries which occur due to the insufficient visibility of the
items.
Answer – If you rent the items and it is obvious that the items are deficient in Retroreflectivity
requirements and levels it may be all parties involved in the use, ownership and set up of the signs and devices.
This is our opinion on rented items.
Answer – Our stance is that you should require documentation for every rental making sure that the signs
and devices meet minimum reflectivity requirements.
Answer – If you do not receive documentation for the signs and devices you are renting and they visibly appear
to be deficient, require the firm you are renting from to replace them immediately. And document your request through E-mail, fax etc.
Answer – In some cases, some State Department of Transportation contracts write in the contract that all
traffic control signs and devices shall be in new or like new condition. However there are some states which
do not enforce the condition of the traffic control signs and devices which are being used on their projects.
Answer – If the work zone is established by an agency other than the State Department of Transportation, it
cannot be assumed that the signs or devices are compliant. They may or may not be up to standard.
Contractors, local municipalities, utility companies etc. are still trying to process the law and the affects it may
have on their operations, subcontracts, and daily operation.
Answer – Yes. The law states that this standard includes permanent temporary and portable traffic signage.
Answer – Possibly all parties involved may be responsible. Our opinion on this subject is that if the signs and devices blatantly
do not meet the Retroreflective requirements and you own
them and continue to use them you may be negligent and or liable for damages or injuries which occur due to the insufficient visibility of the items.
Answer – If you rent the items and it is obvious that the items
are deficient in Retroreflectivity requirements and levels it may
be all parties involved in the use, ownership and set up of the
signs and devices. This is our opinion on rented items.
Answer – Our stance is that you should require documentation
for every rental making sure that the signs and devices meet minimum reflectivity requirements.
Answer – If you do not receive documentation for the signs
and devices you are renting and they visibly appear to be
deficient, require the firm you are renting from to replace them immediately. And document your request through E-mail, fax
etc.
Answer – In some cases, some State Department of
Transportation contracts write in the contract that all traffic
control signs and devices shall be in new or like new condition. However there are some states which do not enforce the condition of the traffic control signs and devices which are
being used on their projects.
Answer – If the work zone is established by an agency other
than the State Department of Transportation, it cannot be assumed that the signs or devices are compliant. They may or
may not be up to standard. Contractors, local municipalities,
utility companies etc. are still trying to process the law and the affects it may have on their operations, subcontracts, and daily operation.
Answer – Yes. The law states that this standard includes permanent temporary and portable traffic signage.
Answer – Ask for documentation from your rental company that the signs for devices have been tested and meet the current Retroreflectivity levels.
Answer – Possibly all parties involved may be responsible. Our opinion on this subject is that if the signs and devices blatantly do not meet the Retroreflective requirements and you own them and continue to use them you may be negligent and or liable for damages or injuries which occur due to the insufficient visibility of the items.
Answer – If you rent the items and it is obvious that the items are deficient in Retroreflectivity requirements and levels it may be all parties involved in the use, ownership and set up of the signs and devices. This is our opinion on rented items.
Answer – Our stance is that you should require documentation for every rental making sure that the signs and devices meet minimum reflectivity requirements.
Answer – If you do not receive documentation for the signs and devices you are renting and they visibly appear to be deficient, require the firm you are renting from to replace them immediately. And document your request through E-mail, fax etc.
Answer – In some cases, some State Department of Transportation contracts write in the contract that all traffic control signs and devices shall be in new or like new condition. However there are some states which do not enforce the condition of the traffic control signs and devices which are being used on their projects.
Answer – If the work zone is established by an agency other than the State Department of Transportation, it cannot be assumed that the signs or devices are compliant. They may or may not be up to standard. Contractors, local municipalities, utility companies etc. are still trying to process the law and the affects it may have on their operations, subcontracts, and daily operation.
Answer – Yes. If you want to ensure the safety of the people and vehicles traveling through your work zone and the personnel working within that work zone we recommend instituting a plan. This will also assist you in liability and negligence claims should an incident or accident occur and you have your work zone set up properly. Documentation and testing may be your best friend in such situations.
Answer – That is impossible to answer because there are many variables which play into the life expectancy of these items. This includes the care, the maintenance, storage, frequency of use and conditions in which they are used. The materials used to manufacture such items also play an important role in the life of such signs and life expectancy.
Answer – There are many things that can affect the Retroreflectivity levels and life expectancy of a traffic sign, this includes but is not limited to:
Answer – The most accurate and accepted method of testing is using a Reflectometer to measure the reflective level of the sign.
Answer – There are many things that can affect the Retroreflectivity levels and life expectancy of a traffic sign, this includes but is not limited to:
Answer – The most accurate and accepted method of testing is using a Reflectometer to measure the reflective level of the sign.
Answer – Yes there is a visual method which may be used. However, you must follow the criteria set forth when doing the visual test to try and get the most accurate results. There are several opinions that a visual testing method may be very difficult to defend in a court of law.